We're sorry but your browser is not supported by Marsh.com.au

For the best experience, please upgrade to a supported browser:

X

Research and Briefings

100 Largest Losses in the Hydrocarbon Industry

 


Welcome to the 26th edition of Marsh JLT Specialty's 100 Largest Losses in the Hydrocarbon Industry report. The publication summarizes the 100 largest property damage losses from the hydrocarbon extraction, transport, and processing industry between 1974 and 2019. It allows us to look back at our industry's history, identify key issues and trends from large losses, and understand whether the industry is making progress.

Losses 

The last two years have been turbulent; eight property damage losses from 2018-19 were among the 50-largest energy losses of all time. Four recent losses were among the 20-largest losses ever.

Not since 1988-89 (when six of the largest ever energy losses occurred — including Piper Alpha), has a two-year period seen such a high concentration of large losses.

Number of Losses in 20 Largest Losses
6                
                 
                4
    3            
          2      
  1   1 1   1 1  
1988-89 1998-99 2000-01 2004-05 2008-09 2010-11 2014-15 2016-18 2018-19
Time Period

Large Losses from 2018-19 were less numerous and severe than those 30 years earlier.

1988-1989 2018-2019
Loss Value (US$m)* Location Loss Value (US$m)* Location
2,088 Piper Alpha, North Sea, UK 800 Jiangsu, China
1,615 Pasadena, Texas, US 750 Philadelphia, US
957 Gulf of Mexico, US 650 Wisconsin, US
811 Campos Basin, Brazil 600 Limbe, Cameroon
737 Nevada, US    
708 Louisiana, US, US    
* On basis of December 31, 2019

Cause of Loss

Declining risk standards in some areas over the past 12 years may be a factor. For example, our risk engineer surveys found that "engineering standards" at refineries declined over this period, and that both gas processing plants and terminals/distribution underwent an overall deterioration in risk quality over the past 12 years.

We also found that plants older than 30 years are far more likely to experience losses, suggesting the industry needs to look more closely at the risks of older refineries and petrochemical plants.

The cause of loss tends to vary depending on the age of a plant, found Liberty Specialty Markets, a contributor to this report. In the first 10 years of a plant’s operation, most losses are caused by operations-related failures.

As plant operations experience develops, the number of losses reduces, until age takes its toll and there is a steep rise in both loss frequency and magnitude in plants more than 30-years-old. In plants older than 30 years, mechanical-integrity-related failures account for 65% of losses.

Barriers to Learning from Past Mistakes

The most commonly cited energy industry risk recommendations made by Marsh JLT Specialty over the past few years ("systems of work," "inspection," and "fireproofing") were prevalent issues among the largest issues in 1988-99 — reinforcing the view that the industry may not have learnt from past mistakes.

During the Piper Alpha incident in 1988, the largest industry property damage loss of all time, there were shortcomings in all three areas of the root cause "systems of work" (which includes permitting, management of change, and shift handover).

Similarly, the largest losses in 1988-1989 and 2018-19 both suffered from the escalating factors "emergency response plans" (ERPs) and "fire protection."

Four key factors arguably prevent lessons from being learnt from losses:

  • Distance: Parties unconsciously feel less affected by events a long way away.
  • Culture: Preventing lessons from being implemented effectively.
  • Tunnel vision: Not realizing wider relevance of lessons.
  • Time: Lessons are learnt, but then forgotten or solutions are insufficiently robust.

"Marsh Pty Ltd (ABN 86 004 651 512, AFSL 238983) (“Marsh”) arrange this insurance and is not the insurer. The Discretionary Trust Arrangement is issued by the Trustee, JLT Group Services Pty Ltd (ABN 26 004 485 214, AFSL 417964) (“JGS”). JGS is part of the Marsh group of companies. Any advice in relation to the Discretionary Trust Arrangement is provided by Jardine Lloyd Thompson Pty Ltd (ABN 69 009 098 864, AFSL 226 827) which is a related entity of Marsh. The cover provided by the Discretionary Trust Arrangement is subject to the Trustee’s discretion and/or the relevant policy terms, conditions and exclusions.

This website contains general information, does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs and may not suit your personal circumstances. For full details of the terms, conditions and limitations of the covers and before making any decision about whether to acquire a product, refer to the specific policy wordings and/or Product Disclosure Statements available from Marsh on request.