Skip to main content
Marsh logo

ESG preparedness a top concern for Australia Pacific financial institutions

Financial institutions in Australia and New Zealand are increasingly facing risks as a result of environmental, social, and governance (ESG)regulatory and reporting requirements.
environmental social governance text on wooden signpost outdoors in nature

12/24/2021 · 6

Just like their counterparts around the world financial institutions in Australia and New Zealand are increasingly facing risks as a result of regulatory and reporting requirements that focus on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) impacts of their operations.

ESG strategy is crucial

There has been a raft of new legislation on ESG issues in 2021 that impact the financial sector both locally and globally in 2021 including:

  • New Zealand financial institutions mandated to make climate related disclosures from 2023 in line with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
  • Australian company directors required to disclose and manage climate-related risk.
  • The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation in the European Union.
  • The Executive Order on Climate-Related Financial Risk in the US.

The ESG performance of companies and institutions in the financial sector is progressively influencing investment decision making, lending criteria, and insurance considerations. Clearly, companies unable to demonstrate an ESG strategy will be putting the long-term viability and resilience of their business at risk. While there is no definitive list of ESG risks for financial institutions to consider, they typically include a blend of the following.

Environmental

Criteria examining an organisation’s impact on the planet, include:

  • Calculation of a company’s total emissions, as a measure of its commitment to addressing climate change.
  • An entity’s plans for transitioning to low-carbon usage to ensure energy security.
  • Monitoring and disclosure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
  • Establishing targets for pollution and waste practices.
  • Projects they invest in or loan to and the impact of those projects.

For financial institutions, the transition to green financing is not only key to an organisation’s reputation, but also emerging as a regulatory requirement globally.

Social

Criteria examining how an organisation treats and values its employees and surrounding communities, include:

  • Labour management policies.
  • Health, safety, and wellbeing commitments.
  • Impacts an organisation has on the local community and whether those effects are beneficial or adverse.  
  • Labour standards of a company’s suppliers.

These concerns are a few of many for financial institutions, along with the need to embed diversity and inclusion policies, social equality, and customer privacy.

Governance

Governance criteria assess a company’s corporate governance practices. These focus on board structure, in particular board diversity, audit quality and transparency, and issues surrounding remuneration, such as executive pay.

Preparedness for ESG risks varies

Financial institutions currently differ vastly in their readiness for the transition to sustainability, at which point organisational agility to respond to new laws, requirements, and customer expectations is going to be key.

In a recent survey by Marsh, 80% of respondents in the financial services sector ranked climate change and ESG as either an important, or the most important, issue for their operations.

However, 42% of respondents said they have an ineffective process, or no process at all, for identifying, responding to, and implementing changes based on climate threats and ESG-related factors.

The survey also found 80% of financial companies had not yet carried out a comprehensive stress test on financial impacts from climate threats across current and future operations.

In the Pacific Region

Financial institutions are well placed to lead the way on ESG across Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands, having the resources and recent experience in an environment of regulatory change.

Larger players across the financial industry have been ramping up for ESG over the past couple of years, looking to understand their own ESG footprint, and considering how to move beyond ‘ticking the boxes’ of the bare minimum, towards real impact and the tipping point when ESG will be a driver of greater profitability.

Staying close to overseas trends in Europe and the US will be important, particularly for organisations keen to attract overseas investment.

Conclusion

Organisations adopting a more proactive and methodical approach to understanding the impact ESG factors and climate change will have on their most valuable assets undoubtedly will be able to embed greater levels of resilience into their operations. As greater attention is given globally to ESG concerns, the need to act will continue to increase sharply.

Key actions to take include:

  • Assess the implications of ESG for your organisation by utilising industry data, risk indices, physical climate models, and key stakeholders’ perspectives.
  • Analyse and establish the means to control the physical, transition, and reputational risks associated with ESG for your organization.
  • Analyse the requirement for external reporting. Many financial institutions globally are already aligning to reporting frameworks, such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).

Acting on the above support the execution of ESG objectives in line with an organisation’s risk appetite and bring practices within established environmental resource management and resilience frameworks.

If you have questions on your ESG and climate change risk and if you want to stay across what global trends will mean for your business locally, please contact your Marsh advisor.

 

Related articles

Aerial drone view of the Circus street in Bath Somerset UK

Article

Building societies: Cyber threats and solutions

11/20/2022
hands using tablet with windows on the back ground

Article

As scrutiny increases, BNPL businesses should take action

11/16/2021

This document is not intended to be taken as advice regarding any individual situation and should not be relied upon as such. The information contained herein is based on sources we believe reliable, but we make no representation or warranty as to its accuracy.  Marsh shall have no obligation to update this publication and shall have no liability to you or any other party arising out of this publication or any matter contained herein.

LCPA 21/516

“Marsh Pty Ltd (ABN 86 004 651 512, AFSL 238983) (“Marsh”) arrange this insurance and is not the insurer. The Discretionary Trust Arrangement is issued by the Trustee, JLT Group Services Pty Ltd (ABN 26 004 485 214, AFSL 417964) (“JGS”). JGS is part of the Marsh group of companies. Any advice in relation to the Discretionary Trust Arrangement is provided by JLT Risk Solutions Pty Ltd (ABN 69 009 098 864, AFSL 226827) which is a related entity of Marsh. The cover provided by the Discretionary Trust Arrangement is subject to the Trustee’s discretion and/or the relevant policy terms, conditions and exclusions. This website contains general information, does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs and may not suit your personal circumstances. For full details of the terms, conditions and limitations of the covers and before making any decision about whether to acquire a product, refer to the specific policy wordings and/or Product Disclosure Statements available from JLT Risk Solutions on request. Full information can be found in the JLT Risk Solutions Financial Services Guide.”