Larry Liu
Communications, Media, and Technology (CMT) Industry Leader, Marsh Risk Asia
-
China
According to Marsh’s Political risk report 2026, governments are increasingly viewing digital infrastructure through a zero-sum lens and the consequences are already visible. In the Middle East, three Amazon hyperscale data centres were reportedly targeted by drone strikes amid escalating conflict — forcing them offline and disrupting banking, payments, and enterprise software across the region. This deliberate targeting sends a stark signal that digital infrastructure is a strategic asset and potential target in geopolitical conflicts.
In today’s complex geopolitical landscape, data centres and digital infrastructure can no longer be evaluated solely on technical or operational criteria. Geopolitical risks now permeate strategic planning, investment decisions, supply chain management, and stakeholder relations.
To safeguard critical assets, protect investment and ensure operational resilience, organisations should adopt a comprehensive approach encompassing the following key actions:
Organisations that build a shared view of geopolitical risk across leadership teams and integrate it early into planning, operations, and, enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks are more resilient and better positioned to act with clarity in uncertain conditions. This can be a leverage to ensure first-mover advantage in a highly competitive landscape.
Businesses that assess geopolitical shifts proactively in their risk strategy are more likely to identify emerging opportunities, avoid downside risks, and align long-term plans with stakeholders before conditions tighten.
Advanced analytical models, like Marsh Risk’s World Risk Review, can help organisations narrow the field of potential conflict risks and enable more strategic resource allocation.
As geopolitical competition reshapes global trade, established relationships are becoming less predictable. Businesses may find access to new customers or suppliers, but these gains often come with greater exposure to non-payment, default, or contractual failure.
Building flexibility into trade, supply-chain, and financing decisions is therefore critical. This may involve reconfiguring supplier networks, diversifying counterparties, and using risk-transfer solutions such as trade credit, business interruption (BI), and structured credit insurance to manage exposure.
Data-driven tools such as Sentrisk can provide real-time visibility of supply chains, helping organisations anticipate and respond immediately and more effectively to geopolitical disruption.
As digital infrastructure becomes a strategic target, protecting physical and financial assets is increasingly critical. Insurance plays an important role in protecting against risks that are difficult to predict or control including political violence and state intervention to cyber incidents and project delivery challenges. This is most effective when combined with scenario planning and a broader view of risk across assets, counterparties, and jurisdictions.
Businesses should consider how geopolitical risk, cyber exposure, and performance-related risks interact and structure coverage accordingly, including the use of:
Our global political risk team has placed US$350 billion in coverage for political risk and structured credit clients and includes more than 150 colleagues across 28 countries. We combine deep geopolitical risk expertise with integrated digital infrastructure solutions, helping organisations assess exposure, protect investments, and navigate an increasingly complex operating environment. Marsh also produces insights on macro risk trends and political risk trends, including our Political risk report.
Communications, Media, and Technology (CMT) Industry Leader, Marsh Risk Asia
China
Head of Geopolitical and Economic Risk Analysis, Credit Specialties Marsh Risk
United Kingdom
This publication is not intended to be taken as advice regarding any individual situation and should not be relied upon as such. The information contained herein is based on sources we believe reliable, but we make no representation or warranty as to its accuracy. Marsh shall have no obligation to update this publication and shall have no liability to you or any other party arising out of this publication or any matter contained herein. Any statements concerning actuarial, tax, accounting, or legal matters are based solely on our experience as insurance brokers and risk consultants and are not to be relied upon as actuarial, accounting, tax, or legal advice, for which you should consult your own professional advisors. Any modelling, analytics, or projections are subject to inherent uncertainty, and any analysis could be materially affected if any underlying assumptions, conditions, information, or factors are inaccurate or incomplete or should change.
Page Compliance ID