Skip to main content

Guide

Mitigating the risk of supply chain cyberattacks: A guide

Discover how to prevent supply chain cyberattacks with expert guidance on threat detection, access control, and third-party risk management.

In today’s interconnected business environment, organizations’ supply chains are increasingly exposed to cyber threats that originate beyond their immediate perimeter. Supply chain cyberattacks that exploit vulnerabilities within trusted third parties can significantly compromise target organizations, underscoring the importance of understanding the quantum of these risks and taking action to identify threats early to maintain operational resilience and protect enterprise value.

What are supply chain cyberattacks?

A supply chain cyberattack targets an organization indirectly, by compromising a trusted third party in its ecosystem, such as a software vendor, managed service provider, hardware manufacturer, or logistics partner. Rather than attacking a primary target head-on, threat actors exploit supply chain vulnerabilities to gain a foothold through trusted access.

The logic is straightforward: organizations invest heavily in securing their own perimeters, yet often extend implicit trust to dozens or hundreds of external partners. And attackers follow the path of least resistance.

According to the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), over 60% of cyberattacks in 2025 involved supply chain vulnerabilities, marking a 48% increase from 2023. The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) reports that nearly 90% of organizations have at least one high-risk third-party relationship that could lead to a breach.

The insurance implications can be significant. A single compromised vendor can trigger simultaneous, correlated claims across an entire portfolio. Understanding the mechanics of these attacks is foundational to sound risk management.

Types of supply chain cyberattacks

Supply chain attacks can manifest across several vectors:

Software supply chain attacks involve the injection of malicious code into legitimate software at the development or distribution stage. Attackers may compromise a company’s build environment, tamper with software updates, or infiltrate open-source packages that developers incorporate into their own applications. The result is that trusted software becomes a delivery mechanism for malware.

Hardware-based attacks target physical components, such as routers, servers, or chips, during manufacturing or shipping. Compromised hardware can enable persistent unauthorized access that is difficult to detect or remediate.

Third-party service provider attacks exploit the privileged access that managed service providers (MSPs), IT contractors, and cloud vendors hold within client environments. Once an attacker controls a service provider’s systems, they inherit that provider’s trusted relationships across its entire client base.

Watering hole attacks involve compromising websites or online resources that a target organization’s employees or suppliers are likely to visit, creating an indirect pathway into the primary target’s network.

Each vector carries distinct risk implications for coverage assessment, liability determination, and incident response planning.

Understanding the impact

The consequences of a successful supply chain cyberattack extend beyond immediate operational disruption. Organizations could face data exfiltration, ransomware deployment, regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and protracted litigation. For insurers, the aggregation risk — in which a single compromised vendor generates correlated losses across multiple policyholders — poses a systemic exposure challenge that requires careful consideration.

Average breach costs in supply chain incidents routinely exceed those of direct attacks, partly because detection is delayed. The IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report found that breaches involving third parties take significantly longer to identify and contain, compounding financial exposure at every stage.

Why are supply chain cyberattacks rising?

As businesses increasingly depend on cloud-based services and third-party IT providers, their attack surface expands, creating more opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities.

Organizations often work with hundreds of suppliers, yet many lack comprehensive assessments of the cybersecurity risks posed by each vendor, leaving gaps that attackers can target.

Often, companies do not continuously monitor vendor security beyond the initial onboarding process, allowing risks to go undetected over time.

Cybercriminals offer pre-packaged ransomware tools designed specifically to infiltrate supply chains, lowering the barrier to entry for attacks and increasing their frequency.

Many suppliers operate in regions with weak or inconsistent cybersecurity regulations, making it challenging to enforce robust security standards and compliance across the entire supply chain.

Six key assessments to minimize the risk of supply chain cyberattacks

Considering the potential widespread impact of supply chain cyberattacks, organizations should adopt a layered, proactive approach that includes the following assessments:

Organizations should enforce the principle of least privilege so that third-party vendors and contractors access only the systems and data strictly necessary for their function. Multi-factor authentication should be mandatory for all external access points. Periodic access reviews minimize the risk of credentials being left active long after a vendor relationship has concluded.

In the context of supply chain security, zero trust means continuously validating every request for access, regardless of its origin. Micro-segmentation limits lateral movement if a third party’s credentials are compromised.

Organizations should conduct rigorous due diligence before onboarding any vendor with system access, including security questionnaires, SOC 2 report reviews, penetration test results, and contractual security obligations. Critically, vendor risk should be assessed continuously, as a supplier’s security posture can deteriorate rapidly.

Subscribing to industry-specific threat feeds and participating in information-sharing communities, such as the Information Sharing and Analysis Centres (ISACs), can enable faster identification of supply chain vulnerabilities before they are exploited.

Organizations should maintain a software bill of materials (SBOM) to catalog third-party components, implement code signing to verify the integrity of updates, and monitor for anomalies in software build pipelines.

It is important to explicitly account for multiple supply chain scenarios. Who is the point of contact at each critical vendor? What contractual rights does the organization have to demand information during an incident? How quickly can third-party access be revoked? Tabletop exercises simulating a supplier compromise are invaluable for stress-testing these procedures before a real event occurs.

Detecting supply chain cyberattacks

Given the stealth with which these attacks operate, detection capabilities are as important as risk mitigation strategies. Organizations should deploy robust endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, monitor network traffic for unusual lateral movement or data exfiltration, and establish behavioral baselines to flag anomalous activity originating from trusted third-party connections.

Threat hunting — proactive searches for indicators of compromise — can be particularly valuable in supply chain scenarios where automated detection may lag sophisticated intrusions.

Strengthening supply chain resilience through thorough vigilance

Supply chain risk management is a fundamental component of enterprise cyber risk. For risk managers, this means applying the same level of rigor to third-party cyber exposures as that given to direct operational risks.

Effectively addressing supply chain blind spots through disciplined security measures, continuous vendor oversight, and coordinated incident response is essential to robust, modern cyber risk management.

Speak with a Marsh representative

Let’s start a conversation. Provide some details and let’s connect.

Related insights