Skip to main content

Case study

How the Kangmei “class action” lawsuit impacts D&O risks in China

Close of up table with equipment in conference room. 3D Rendering

Risk for China’s publicly traded companies and their directors and officers escalated by landmark litigation and ruling

In late 2021, the ruling of China’s first class action lawsuit against Kangmei Pharmaceuticals by the People’s Court of Guangzhou underlined the imperative of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) to push for special representative action suits on a more regular basis, and in the process escalating directors and officers (D&O) risks in the country.

Under the ruling, the publicly listed Kangmei must compensate its shareholders ¥2.459 billion (US$385 million) for making false statements in its annual report. The Court also ordered the former chairman, his wife, and four ex-management team members who were held directly responsible to assume 100% of the joint and several liabilities of the verdict. These liabilities would allow Kangmei itself, under certain circumstances, to demand reimbursements for the amount paid out to shareholders and hence expose the individuals to liability potentially amounting to billions of yuan.  

Notably, several independent directors were ordered to assume either 5% or 10% of the total liability despite their defence of having no active involvement in the fraud. In summary, the willingness of the Court to impose a compensation of this size and scope means that publicly listed companies and D&Os in China must immediately reassess their risk exposures. 

How representative securities litigation works in China

In 2020, the Supreme People's Court of China released the Provisions on Issues of Representative Securities Litigation (Provisions) that marked the launch of a class-action styled lawsuit system.  Under the Provisions, shareholders of Chinese publicly traded companies may opt to proceed under Ordinary Representative Litigation (ORL) or Special Representative Litigation (SRL), according to their group size and characteristics, as long as the following conditions are fulfilled:

  • There is commonality of the claim/subject matter.
  • There is prima facie evidence of an administrative punishment decision (such as a criminal judgment, an admission made by the Defendant or a disciplinary punishment decision made by a stock exchange). 

The ORL is made up of groups of more than 10 persons. With the SRL, an “investor protection institution,” mandated by 50 or more qualified investors during the announced registration period, can participate in legal actions as a representative of shareholders on its own initiative. Currently, the state-backed, non-profit China Securities Investor Services Center (CSISC) is the only entity authorized to act as a special representative.

Other notable features of the Provisions: 

  • There is an announcement for registration.
  • An opt-out provision allows the representative to proceed in the interests of all shareholders except those who opt out.
  • Fees are not required to be paid in advance, in the courts’ discretion, and can also be refunded to losing litigants, again, subject to discretion.
  • Taxation/recoverability of legal costs and fees is available.
  • If an investor withdraws from a litigation, his/her fees will be refunded.
  • Undertakings for property preservation are available but not mandatory.

In the Kangmei lawsuit, 11 shareholders started an ORL legal action against Kangmei.  In the CSISC’s view, the use of an ORL in this situation was warranted because the case had met several criteria including: 

  • An administrative penalty had been issued (by the CSRC).
  • The case had a negative impact on society.
  • The defendant had the financial means to pay compensation to investors.

The CSISC, after making the above finding, brought its own SRL which led to the recent decision and award.

Risk management implications 

The implications of the Provisions, particularly the SRL and the Kangmei decision, for D&Os of Chinese companies, or for any companies whose shares are traded on PRC exchanges (or who are thinking of listing there),  are severe and far-reaching.  First and foremost, the possibility of being the subject of a suit under the SRL system has moved from the realm of theory to reality. 

In addition, the CSRC statement on policy makes it clear that these suits will become more normalized as the Chinese authorities regard this as an efficient way to establish additional regulatory control over the securities industry.  

Lastly, the Kangmei matter highlights the severity of this risk, particularly for the individual D&Os who may be forced to assume responsibility for a large share of the liability that is far beyond his or her actual involvement and compensation. For instance, even though Kangmei’s independent directors were reportedly compensated under ¥100,000 per annum for serving as independent directors, each could be liable to pay up to ¥246 million, or 10% of the liability.

All of the financial consequences, of course, comes with the exposure to criminal liability; the former chairman of Kangmei was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment.

Advice and guidance for D&Os

With risk frequency and severity drastically elevated, all D&Os, insurance risk managers and general counsel should seek to mitigate and/or otherwise manage this risk.  Accordingly, the risk needs to be managed with the following combination of techniques:

  • Robust internal risk framework, including policies procedures and controls on accounting and finances. 
  • This risk framework must include, on top of the code of corporate governance, empowered independent directorship and other applicable risk committees.
  • Extensive third party accounting/financial audits and accounting reviews (no set schedule, unannounced).
  • External, independent, extensive background checks on directors and C-suite officers.
  • A risk sharing strategy using a traditional management liability (D&O) insurance policy with appropriate limits, where available; or risk financing where traditional coverage is not available.

Clearly, simply performing normal suitability checks on Directors and C-suite officers, standard scheduled audits and having the usual Board audit committee is an approach that is not robust enough in this new climate.  

Similarly, deploying a “minimal” insurance coverage strategy (minimal coverage, minimal limits) will no longer be acceptable. A full policy of Side A (individual liability, not indemnified by the company), Side B (individual liability, indemnified by company), and Side C (company securities class action coverage) purchased at proper pricing and adequate limit of liability is highly recommended.   

Companies whose stocks are traded on PRC exchanges must immediately and holistically improve their risk management maturity level, and Marsh stands ready to assist.

What Marsh can do for you

Marsh, the largest risk advisor and insurance broker in the world, can assist you with managing elevated D&O risks with risk advisory and consulting services as well as insurance procurement/broking and risk financing assistance.  Operating across 12 cities in China, our PRC office has strong local presence and knowledge to help you better understand local risk exposures and navigate local insurance markets.

In addition, Marsh Claims Solutions FINPRO, Asia, brings an experienced team of claims advocates and professionals to the table.  This team incudes experience in handling securities class action cases for companies traded on PRC exchanges.

Meet our specialists to learn more

Alex Rosati

Head of Claims, FINPRO, Asia

*Please note that this article is solely intended to provide insurance risk advice and is not intended to, nor should it be substituted for, advice by a licensed legal professional.  As such, legal advice should always be sought, whether internal or external, when approaching this risk.