Ellen Charnley
President, Marsh Captive Solutions
-
United States
Recognising that a wide array of internal and external stakeholders are basing their decisions on Environmental, Social, and Governance factors, Marsh launched its ESG Risk Rating in March 2022. It is a complimentary self-assessment that enables clients to measure their organisation’s environmental, social, and governance performance, understand their ESG risk profiles, and gain access to risk and insurance benefits.
As more companies use the tool, the trends and correlations from the insights given are becoming more evident. We are finding potentially significant relationships in the data relevant to the management and mitigation of risk. For example, in October 2022, we were able to show that organisations with stronger social performance experience better claims performance for workers’ compensation. Now, we are seeing early signs of a positive correlation between companies with captives and their ESG rating – and here we take a deeper dive into this finding.
Many leaders are exploring alternative strategies to finance their risk to counter the higher insurance rates, lack of capacity, and more stringent carrier terms and conditions they are experiencing. One of the most popular is through a captive insurance company.
When we started our analysis our expectation was that companies with captives would have higher ESG scores as they tend to be more proactive in their risk management. We expected this to especially be the case for the ‘G’ component.
Our analysis was based on data from over 100 large companies, being those with a revenue of $1 billion or more. Our results did find a correlation, we found that companies with captives had higher average ESG Risk Rating scores than those without. However, we were surprised that the strongest statistical significance was found in the ‘S’ component, specifically within the themes of Clients & Customers and Employment & Wealth Generation. Our findings are outlined below in more detail.
Captive owners are more likely to have stronger credentials than non-captive owners when it comes to the Social dimension of ESG.
Captive owners are more likely to meet the criteria of people-related sustainability standards such as the following:
This is likely due to captive owners typically having greater collaboration and harmonisation between risk management and human resources (HR), as people-related risks are self-insured via their captive.
[1] The Marsh ESG Risk Rating has 19-key ‘Themes’, tied closely to the World Economic Forum’s framework for sustainability (WEF (2020), Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism)
With regard to Employment & Wealth Generation, captive owners are more likely to have practices in place to control, monitor & report employee remuneration and turnover by diversity metrics, and be more inclusive in their recruitment practices.
Captive owners are more likely to regularly assess their Clients & Customers portfolios against ESG criteria; have policies and procedures in place to protect customer data privacy.
Captive owners are more likely to score higher on questions pertaining to their Highest Governance Body construct, and incorporation of ESG issues into it.
Companies with captives are in a good position to showcase how their existing processes and protocols feed into their ESG risk mitigation and management. Our ESG Risk Rating tool has been valuable for helping our clients to confidentially assess their ESG profile against international best practice and communicate this to their stakeholders.
Through insight garnered from our rating tool, we have found that ESG performance and risk appear to be intrinsically linked across many different dimensions. The ESG Risk Rating self-assessment is providing the missing link to enable the discovery of correlations and analysis of trends. This allows clients to robustly differentiate themselves in an increasingly complex risk landscape.
[2] Our correlation analyses include testing for variance, normal distribution and then p-value non parametric tests (Mann-Whitney) to arrive at ESG dimensions with >95% confidence of statistical significance in correlation.
To know more speak to our Captive teams
President, Marsh Captive Solutions
United States
Risk Management Leader, Europe
Ireland
Americas Sales and Consulting Leader, Marsh Captive Solutions
United States
This publication is not intended to be taken as advice regarding any individual situation and should not be relied upon as such. The information contained herein is based on sources we believe reliable, but we make no representation or warranty as to its accuracy. Marsh shall have no obligation to update this publication and shall have no liability to you or any other party arising out of this publication or any matter contained herein. Any statements concerning actuarial, tax, accounting, or legal matters are based solely on our experience as insurance brokers and risk consultants and are not to be relied upon as actuarial, accounting, tax, or legal advice, for which you should consult your own professional advisors. Any modelling, analytics, or projections are subject to inherent uncertainty, and any relevant analysis could be materially affected if any underlying assumptions, conditions, information, or factors are inaccurate or incomplete or should change. Marsh makes no representation or warranty concerning the application of policy wordings or the financial condition or solvency of insurers or re-insurers. Marsh makes no assurances regarding the availability, cost, or terms of insurance coverage. LCPA 23/250