Skip to main content

Report

Captive insurer growth continues as advantages pique interest

More organisations than ever before are using captives as a valuable risk management tool.
Teamwork businessmen co-working on laptop computer with synconize business graphic, financial graph data monitoring on screen in modern office, business team co working concept

Marsh Captive Solutions benchmarking results

By various measures, the use of captive insurers is growing across the board. As risk-funding vehicles that offer numerous advantages, interest in using captives is higher than ever.

In the past three years, Marsh clients formed nearly 400 new captive entities. Globally, Marsh Captive Solutions now manages approximately 1,900 captives and other entities across 55 domiciles — that equates to one in every four captives. Premium volume of Marsh-managed captives has topped US$70 billion, with surplus of almost $120 billion.

Captive Growth

Captive insurers are growing across all regions and all lines of business.
selected option

In all regions, captive premium growth over the past two years continued to trend upward. Even mature captive markets, such as Europe and the island domiciles, have seen growth. For example:

  • North America: Premiums for captives with North America-based parents were up 15%, while the major island domiciles of Bermuda, Cayman Islands, and Barbados have collectively seen premiums grow by 11%.
  • Europe: Guernsey and Luxembourg, two leading European domiciles, have seen premium growth of 13% and 36%, respectively.
  • UK: Premiums increased 8%.
  • Asia: Captives with Asia-based parents wrote 58% more premium.
  • Latin America: Premiums among captives with parents based in Latin America grew 36%.

Historically, captive growth has occurred during periods of rising commercial insurance pricing as buyers retain more risk. However, even as rate increases began to slow for certain lines of business and regions, captives continued to grow — a trend Marsh foresees continuing.

Traditional property and casualty coverages account for the largest segment of captive premium, at 36%. Other coverages that Marsh-managed captives fund are: life insurance, 30%; employee benefits, 19%; and financial lines, 15%.

Interest in non-traditional lines of coverage also continues to grow. On the employee benefit side, medical stop-loss premiums in captives were up 32%, while in voluntary benefits it increased 39%. On the casualty side, directors and officers (D&O) liability increased 100%. Cyber premiums in captives have risen 57%, and notably the number of Marsh-managed captives writing cyber has increased by more than 75%.

During the hard property market of recent years, Marsh captives have experienced a 7% premium increase just in North America. Fronted reinsurance, quota shares, excess, and captives have been participating in property layers in new ways.

Casualty coverage, long a backbone of captives is also undergoing an evolution. Many captive owners want to know how to become smarter about what they are financing. There has been a lot of growth in the casualty space, with workers’ compensation remaining the biggest segment.

The challenging market has caused some captive owners to ask how they can change their approach to get different results from the past. This is manifesting in such things as tie-ins to employee benefits, collaboration with HR, and growth and expansion of the captive footprint.

Third-party business had historically represented a small fraction of captive premium, but is now 27% of Marsh-managed captive premium. More captive owners are interested in capturing underwriting profit and investment income on cash flow associated with insuring third-party risks. In addition to diversifying the captive’s risk portfolio, third-party coverages — such as pet insurance, umbrella liability, automobile, and extended warranties — can enhance a captive’s profitability.

Putting such a diverse set of risk categories into the captive helps to spread volatility across multiple coverage lines, and can lower volatility in the captive itself. 

Cell captives multiplying

Captives come in several forms, including single-parent captives, group captives, and protected cells, which is one of the fastest-growing forms. Cells are variously known as protected cell companies (PCCs), segregated portfolio companies (SPCs), segregated account companies (SACs), or incorporated cell companies (ICCs). Their names may vary from domicile to domicile, but their structure is similar in that each cell is individually capitalized and separated from other cells — and often referred to as a rent-a-captive.

Protected cell captives represent 25% of new captive entity formations for Marsh Captive Solutions in the US and globally. Advantages of protected cell captives include:

  • Up to 50% lower operating costs, compared to a single-parent captive.
  • Set-up time can be as short as a few days, rather than months.
  • Established infrastructure of service providers.
  • Potential to achieve same financial advantages as a single-parent captive.
Check out full report

   

Industry sectors find value in captives

A number of trends can be seen in the top five industries for captive premium growth.

Financial institutions (FI)

Representing 52% of Marsh premiums and 32% of captive premium growth, this sector faces a volatile insurance market and corporate governance obligations. And with the growing sophistication in risk financing techniques, the FI industry continues to be far and away the largest user of captives, across all industries.  Growing coverages include crime/fidelity, general liability, medical stop loss, and professional liability.

Communications, media, and technology (CMT)

A rapidly evolving market and a growing sophistication in available risk financing techniques have contributed to a steady uptake in captive solutions by CMT companies. Ten percent of premiums managed by Marsh are within this sector, which represents 7% of captive premium growth, with increasing coverages for cyber, D&O, errors and omissions (E&O), and medical stop loss.

Retail/wholesale

Retailers and wholesalers with retail operations face an evolving risk landscape, which is accelerating due to technology implementations and customer demands. With the new landscape come new needs for innovative risk consulting and transfer solutions. This sector represents 7% of Marsh’s captive premiums, having experienced a 52% growth in premiums. Auto liability, cyber, property – nuclear, biological, chemical, radiological (NBCR), and property terrorism (through the federal Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA)) are the emerging growth areas.

Automotive

The global automotive industry faces new risks and opportunities brought on by technological change, shifts in consumer demand, and growing environmental concerns. This sector represents 4% of premiums managed by Marsh, and experienced 22% captive premium growth. Coverages for employee benefits, cargo, property, and supply chain are becoming increasingly important.

Transportation

Accelerating globalization and digitization have reinvented much of the transportation and logistics industry. Companies must now adapt to the increased potential for cyberattacks, litigation, changing regulations, emergence of new products and services, and heightened competition from startups and other recent entrants. Transportation represents 2% of premiums managed by Marsh, and experienced a 40% growth in captive premium. Excess liability, marine and cargo, property TRIA, and workers’ compensation have become the leading growth areas.

Report

2023 Captive Landscape

For more information, download our 2023 benchmarking report, learn more about captive insurance via “The Definitive Guide to Captive Insurance,” or contact your Marsh representative.

Marsh makes no representation or warranty concerning the application of policy wordings or the financial condition or solvency of insurers or re-insurers. Marsh makes no assurances regarding the availability, cost, or terms of insurance coverage. Any modelling, analytics, or projections are subject to inherent uncertainty, and any relevant analysis could be materially affected if any underlying assumptions, conditions, information, or factors are inaccurate or incomplete or should change. LCPA 23/293