By Paul Hutchinson ,
UK Commercial and Corporate Claims Leader
23/09/2026 · 6 minute read
The UK Government has published key statutory guidance under the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 – known as Martyn's law. The Act received royal assent on 3 April 2025. It is expected to come into force in spring 2027. It will require many publicly accessible premises and certain events to take proportionate steps to reduce the risk of physical harm from terrorist incidents and terrorist attacks.
The new guidance gives organisations clearer direction on how the duty is expected to work in practice. This includes whether they are in scope, who is accountable, and what proportionate measures may look like in real settings. The Home Office published the statutory guidance on 15 April 2026. It includes decision trees, compliance steps, and other detailed information. It also addresses misconceptions and provides further information on how the duty should be applied.
The law is named after Martyn Hett. Many people continue to pay tribute to him, to Martyn's mother, and to others affected by the horrific Manchester arena attack.
Although the duty is not yet in force, organisations can now move from general awareness to practical planning, as the guidance has been published, and the regulator has been identified.
For many organisations, this will not be only a security or facilities issue. It may affect board accountability, operations, supplier oversight, and reputation.
The Act marks a significant milestone in UK legislation. It turns counter terrorism planning into a clearer statutory obligation. It also creates new obligations for parts of the private sector, with wider implications for claims trends and insurance planning. There will be an implementation period before enforcement, which should give organisations sufficient time to prepare.
The Home Office guidance explains how the duty will apply to qualifying premises and qualifying events. It covers:
A key message runs through the guidance. Examples are illustrative, not final answers. Organisations must consider the specific circumstances of their own premises or events. This fits with the Act’s focus on what is reasonably practicable.
The guidance also makes clear that private events are excluded from the main compliance regime. That helps explain which certain premises are likely to be covered.
More broadly, the act establishes a framework for better public protection. Its purpose is to support public safety in public spaces and other public premises.
The guidance includes examples from a wide range of settings, such as:
This matters because many organisations will have a portfolio of sites. Some may fall into different tiers. Some may also host events that change their risk and compliance position.
That may include smaller premises, larger premises, and certain larger premises. The right answer will depend on the use of the site, its capacity, and the scope required by the Act. The guidance points to a reasonable expectation that organisations assess each site on its own facts.
The Security Industry Authority (SIA) has been named as the regulator for the new duty. Its published guidance, referenced in a Clyde & Co article, explains how it expects to engage with duty-holders. This includes inspection, enforcement, and sanctions for serious non-compliance.
This means organisations should be ready to comply with the legal duty and related legislative requirements. The wider material also refers to a supplementary document and a non statutory supplementary document that support the main guidance.
Organisations can use the guidance to build a practical readiness plan. Typical next steps include:
The new protect duty does not require every venue to take the same steps. It encourages organisations to take proportionate action based on their own risks.
That means what is right for smaller premises may differ from what is right for larger premises or enhanced tier premises. The guidance does not say every organisation must remove all risk. Rather, it expects venues to assess vulnerabilities and improve preparedness where needed.
In simple terms, neither the home office nor the regulator is saying that every venue must do everything at once. The aim is practical improvement, clearer ownership, and better readiness.
Marsh works with clients to strengthen resilience against evolving security risks and regulatory expectations. Support can include:
If you would like to discuss how Martyn’s Law may affect your organisation, and how to plan for proportionate compliance, we can help you build a roadmap ahead of 2027.
Sources
This article is for information purposes only and is not legal advice.