Skip to main content
Marsh logo

Article

Defense strategy: Better protect the organization through effective risk management

The substantial risk of social inflation to organizations’ finances and reputation requires careful attention to defense tactics that take into consideration societal attitudes, media narratives, and juror psychology.

03/04/2026 · 3 minute read

The substantial risk of social inflation to organizations’ finances and reputation requires careful attention to defense tactics that take into consideration societal attitudes, media narratives, and juror psychology.

In an increasingly complex environment, organizations need a comprehensive and adaptable defense strategy that prioritizes risk management to safeguard organizational integrity.

Understanding today’s litigation environment

Today’s jurors tend to be more socially conscious and emotionally driven, influenced by broad narratives that extend beyond the specifics of the case, including concerns about corporate responsibility, fairness, and systemic issues. Plaintiffs’ attorneys frequently employ strategies designed to tap into these emotions, portraying defendants as indifferent, or even harmful, to the community, prioritizing profits over safety for the public in general.

This shift requires defense teams to think beyond legal arguments and work to shape narratives that may resonate with jurors. This means recognizing factors that may sway juror perceptions, such as the organization’s reputation, perceived transparency, and demonstrated commitment to safety and accountability.

Developing a holistic defense approach

A successful defense begins with an early, thorough case assessment that involves evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the legal claims, understanding potential damages, and — where possible — analyzing the jury pool for any insights. Engaging experienced defense counsel familiar with the industry and plaintiff tactics, jurisdiction, and high-stakes litigation is essential.

Once this foundation is established, legal teams can develop narratives that emphasize the organization’s proactive efforts to prevent harm, compliance with regulations, and, when appropriate, expressions of remorse or responsibility, regardless of liability.

Early involvement of forensic expert witnesses enables thorough technical assessments and allows them time to build their testimony. Jury consultants and media strategists provide valuable trial guidance. Case management systems can help organize evidence, while advanced analytics can provide insights on jury selection and trial strategy.

Detailed documentation of internal investigations and safety measures can help humanize the organization and counter negative or inaccurate portrayals. Demonstrating that the organization has taken steps to mitigate risks can counteract plaintiff narratives that seek to paint the defendant as reckless or uncaring.

Managing external communications is also critical. Coordinated messaging aligned with legal strategy helps maintain credibility and supports the defense narrative.

7 tactical risk management actions

In an environment where social inflation has become a real and significant risk, organizations would be wise to adopt a nuanced, comprehensive litigation and defense strategy that includes the following actions:

  • Initiate early case assessment: Engage experienced defense counsel promptly to evaluate case merits, potential damages, and jury dynamics.
  • Strategically select attorneys: Choose defense firms with expertise in the relevant industry, jurisdiction, plaintiff tactics, and high-stakes litigation. Consider involving appellate counsel from the outset.
  • Develop a compelling narrative: Craft defense narratives that emphasize safety, compliance, responsibility, empathy, and community engagement.
  • Engage credible expert witnesses early: Retain forensic and other experts who can help you challenge technical claims and support defense positions.
  • Coordinate communications: Align legal strategies with media and public relations efforts to manage societal perceptions.
  • Utilize technology effectively: Employ case management and analytics tools to enhance trial preparation and jury analysis.
  • Conduct comprehensive post-verdict reviews: Conduct thorough analysis of verdict outcomes to inform appeals, reputation management, and organizational learning.

Social inflation and nuclear verdicts can cripple an organization, underscoring the importance of a thought-out approach to mitigate this risk. Having a strategic and adaptable defense strategy approach can help navigate the unpredictability of high-stakes litigation and minimize exposure to nuclear verdicts.   

Speak with a Marsh Risk representative

Let’s start a conversation. Provide some details and let’s connect.

Contact us

Related insights

People are listening with interest to the speech

Article

Post-verdict learning: Embedding insights for continuous improvement

03/06/2026
Colleagues talking about news from a tablet

Article

Claims resolution: Mitigating risk through a tactical approach

03/06/2026
Person using a digital pen on tablet

Article

Identification and early intervention: Managing claims before they escalate

03/05/2026
Woman shows by hand

Article

Prevention and preparedness: Building resilience through proactive pre-claim strategies

03/05/2026
View more