By Harsh S Dutia ,
Portfolio Manager, Marsh Privaty Equity M&A (PEMA)
09/22/2026 · 2 minute read
When a private equity (PE) firm introduces a portfolio insurance program, some resistance from portfolio companies is to be expected. Some leaders may worry about giving up control over insurance decisions or assume the program will add complexity rather than simplify insurance-related processes.
In many cases, however, that pushback stems from unfamiliarity with how coordinated programs work and how they add value. With clear communication and by demonstrating results, even skeptical leaders may become strong advocates.
Addressing resistance starts with acknowledging concerns directly. From there, the conversation can shift to showing portfolio company leaders how a well-structured program is not designed to take away control but rather intended to support their priorities by reducing costs, improving coverage, easing administrative burdens, and preserving autonomy.
Sharing real examples can be especially helpful when talking with portfolio companies’ leaders about the value of a portfolio program. Hearing how similar companies benefited — whether through lower costs, improved coverage, or better service — can demonstrate the tangible results these programs can deliver, which include:
When making a case for the rollout of a portfolio program, it often helps to emphasize that participation is voluntary, and the decision-making process is collaborative. Portfolio companies should be encouraged to evaluate the program on its merits and decide whether it makes sense for their business. This approach helps to build trust and reinforce respect for their independence.
Ultimately, most companies shift their perspective once they see the data and experience the support provided by the portfolio manager or broker team.
In the end, the successful rollout of a portfolio program does not depend on mandates. Instead, it hinges on education, dialogue, and a focus on demonstrating value.