Extreme weather-related exposures are reshaping the way asset owners and investors think about an asset’s resilience and long-term value. Amid concerns around climate-related losses, access to affordable insurance is increasingly influencing whether assets are considered financeable, bankable, and ultimately viable over the life of an investment.
This shift is driving more attention to forward-looking climate analysis. Many organizations are looking more closely at how both acute risks, such as storms, floods, and wildfires, and chronic risks, like rising temperatures and water stress, could affect assets over time and what that could mean for resilience, operations, and exit value. And with climate impacts appearing in both traditional and less conventional claims patterns, greater attention is being paid to adaptation measures and the role resilience investments can play in supporting long-term asset performance.
In this episode of Risk in Context, Amy Barnes, Marsh’s Global Head of Energy & Power, speaks with Callum Ellis, Marsh’s Head of Climate Resilience in the UK, Doug Halvorson, Managing Director within Marsh’s Private Equity Mergers and Acquisitions Practice in the US, and Steve Hatfield, co-head of Global Sustainability at Carlyle. They discuss why insurability has become a critical consideration for investors, why historical assumptions may no longer be enough, and how a more structured approach to resilience could help organizations make better-informed investment and risk management decisions.