The Suez Canal, which connects the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, accounts for 12-15% of global trade and 20-30% of global container shipping volumes. Recent supply chain delays caused by the Red Sea crisis has been further exacerbated by extreme weather conditions that caused the Panama Canal in Central America to become impassable for extended periods.
In the Red Sea, a major shipping and logistics company flagged that disruptions would reduce capacity between Asia and Europe by up to 20% in the second quarter of 2024, with the risk zones expanding and reaching further offshore.1 The Red Sea crisis has led to a decrease of 67% in container ship transits.
The average price of transporting a 40-foot container on a cargo ship has increased significantly. From mid-December 2023 to mid-May 2024, the Drewry’s World Container Index increased from US$1,521 per 40 ft to US$3,159 per 40 ft. This increase in shipping costs has been highest on Asia-Europe routes, which typically pass through the Red Sea. Average shipping cost rates from Shanghai have more than doubled since early December 2023, while rates to Europe have more than tripled. Some shipping lines continue to sail through the Red Sea and Suez Canal with naval escorts, which can further increase shipping costs.
In addition to higher charter rates, fuel costs on the affected routes are also 40% higher per journey, resulting in higher surcharges for shippers,2 and higher carbon emissions. A large container ship’s journey from Shanghai to Hamburg emits 38% more carbon dioxide (CO2), equating to 4.32 million kilogrammes, if it goes around Africa instead of through the Suez Canal, according to data from LSEG3.
As a result of the Red Sea crisis forcing diversions and delays, rates for breach of warranty (BoW) insurance coverage have risen for a single voyage between seven to 14 days. Cargo markets are also charging a premium for sailing through the Red Sea, compared to no premium charged previously.
In addition to higher shipping rates, surcharges, and insurance premiums, businesses also face disruptions from the loss or damage of goods (e.g. spoilage) as a result of the Red Sea crisis and longer shipping times. Sectors such as energy markets, food and agriculture, metals, and manufacturing — especially industries with short ‘product-to-market’ life cycles — can suffer amplified losses from the restricted availability of parts and components.
Marsh Asia recommends the following strategies for businesses to gain control over the movement of goods, routes, subcontractors, and liability:
From a risk perspective, businesses should review their marine cargo policy wordings and consider increasing coverage for rerouting, and completion of voyage costs, even in delay-only scenarios where no physical damage has been incurred.
For businesses directly involved in an attack, they can rely on Marsh Asia’s claims advisory expertise to ensure their interests are protected.
To effectively manage port-related risks, businesses can consider:
Marsh is dedicated to assisting businesses in navigating risk complexities such as port congestion risks, address supply chain price hikes, and more to ensure that your interests are protected in a volatile environment with tailored solutions specific to your business goals.
Get in touch with a Marsh Marine and Cargo specialist.
1 Reuters. (May 2024). Maersk says Red Sea disruption could cut Asia-Europe capacity by 20%. https://www.reuters.com/business/red-sea-disruption-cuts-q2-capacity-by-15-20-maersk-says-2024-05-06/
2 Maersk. (May 2024.) What the situation in the Red Sea means for your business. https://www.maersk.com/news/articles/2024/05/06/what-the-situation-in-the-red-sea-means-for-your-business
3 Escalating emissions: How Red Sea disruptions are driving up carbon emissions. https://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/escalating-emissions-how-red-sea-disruptions-are-driving-up-carbon-emissions/#:~:text=Those%20extra%20kilometers%20(miles)%20are,pulled%20for%20Reuters%20by%20LSEG.